Showing posts with label california. Show all posts
Showing posts with label california. Show all posts

Monday, January 22, 2018

Domestic Violence Restraining Orders Information

A domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) is a court order that is designed to legally restrain a person's abusive conduct and/or communication with a protected person and/or give legal permission to the protected person to do something that the protected would not ordinarily be legally allowed to do.
Examples: 1) A domestic violence restraining order may be used to restrain a person from contacting or communicating, directly or indirectly, with a protected person, or the protected person's family, 2) A domestic violence restraining order may give legal permission to a protected person to secretly audio record the another person, or 3) A domestic violence restraining order may allow the protected person to have temporary control of the family home, and more. Other common DVROs are listed below.
Domestic violence is defined as physical or emotional abuse directed at a close family member, a current or former spouse, or at persons who are dating or have dated romantically. A domestic violence restraining order is intended to legally abate the abuse and establish protection for the protected person and his or her family. Abuse includes, but is not limited to: annoying, harassing, threatening, assaulting, stalking, molesting, or intimidating the protected person, or his or her property, directly or indirectly. 
Note: There are different types of restraining orders, including domestic violence restraining orders, civil harassment restraining orders, criminal protective orders (CPOs), elder abuse restraining orders, workplace employee restraining orders, and more. This article is dedicated to a discussion of domestic violence restraining orders that are filed in family law court. For information on other types of restraining orders, please contact our divorce and family law attorneys for a free consultation.
Common domestic violence restraining orders include:
  • Order to stay away from the protected person/s
  • Order to not contact, directly or indirectly, with the protected person
  • Order to contact peacefully only (Also called no-negative contact orders)
  • Order to not harass, annoy, molest, stalk, or threaten the protected person
  • Order to relinquish, sell, or store firearm/s
  • Order to transfer a phone number
  • Order to move out of a home (temporary or permanent)
  • Order allowing secret audio recording of restrained person
  • Order for restitution on damage to victim (lost wages, medical bills, etc.)
  • Order for restitution on property damage
  • Order for alimony (also called spousal support)
  • Order for child support, child custody, and child visitation
  • Order for attorney fees
  • Order to enroll in domestic violence batterers classes
  • Order for supervised visits
  • Order for mediation to determine child custody or visitation
  • Order to abate travel with children
  • Order to establish parentage, and more.
Collateral consequences upon a loss to a DVRO requestIn addition to any that might be made against the defendant, other consequences from a loss to a DVRO request can include: possible loss of visitation or custody of children, loss of the right to own or possess firearms, loss of employment, loss of reputation, loss of immigration status, and more. It is highly advised that a litigant to a DVRO request seek the assistant of a divorce or family law attorney without delay.
Cautionary Note: Procedures, rules, and necessary forms that are required for obtaining a domestic violence restraining order are discussed herein, but please remember, there is no good substitute to the retention of an experienced and successful family law attorney and/or criminal defense attorney to make sure you have the best chances of success on your request for, or defense of, a DVRO.
Remember the facts supporting a DVRO are often the same facts that support a criminal action and/or a civil lawsuit against the defendant, i.e. stalking (PC 646.9), battery (PC 242 & 243(d)), assault (PC 240, 245(a)), domestic violence (PC 243(e)(1), 273.5), criminal threats (PC 422), annoying phone calls (PC 653m), distributing nude images for revenge (PC 647(f)(4), vandalism (PC 594), trespass (PC 602), contempt of court (PC 166), violation of a protective order (PC 273.6), unauthorized audio recording (PC 632), residential burglary (PC 459), and more. All statements and conduct made by either side in a DVRO request may be used against either side in a subsequent criminal prosecution by the district attorney or a civil lawsuit for damages and restitution. Note: Your own evidence can be used against you if you are not careful in pursuing or defending a domestic violence restraining order.
A cursory knowledge of the law and the required legal forms do not win DVRO cases and a litigant should certainly never defend against a DVRO request without the legal representation of family law attorney and maybe even a criminal defense attorney as the facts that often times support the allegations in a DVRO request have underlying criminal application. If you are able to do so you should hire a family law attorney familiar with criminal defense issues to assist you with your DVRO case, especially if you are defending against a request for DVRO. Our attorneys are trained in collecting, investigating, preserving, and producing evidence in court. Our attorneys are also familiar on which arguments are successful in front of particular judges, and just as importantly, which arguments to avoid in front of particular judges. Our family law and criminal defense attorneys are experienced with the strict rules of evidence production (especially the rules of evidence concerning direct and cross-examination of witnesses), the many rules of court, and the practiced art of persuasion. Some of the biggest mistakes that litigants without attorneys make in prosecuting or defending DVROs is assuming that the evidence they have to support their case will be allowed to be presented, not knowing how to legally prevent the opposing side from presenting damaging evidence, and not following the strict legal rules of timing, service, notice, and post-hearing legal procedures. Remember, judges are not lenient on the rules of court, rules of law, or the rules of legal procedure just because a litigant is not aware of them.
Requirements for requesting DVROs: Domestic violence restraining orders are requested when the protected person and the person sought to be restrained are closely related, living together in a relationship (married or unmarried), or have dated romantically. This includes: all romantic relationships, domestic partnerships, spouses, siblings, parents, children, grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, and cousins. The legal forms required for obtaining or defending a domestic violence restraining order are found at the bottom right of this page or by clicking DVRO Forms:
For DVROs, the protected person will need to prove that he or she, or a member or his or her family, has directly or indirectly, been harassed, annoyed, molested, threatened, stalked, intimidated, or abused, by a close family member, or a current or former romantic partner, whether married or unmarried. 
Emergency protective orders (EPOs & Ex parte hearings): If a person feels that he or she needs emergency protection from imminent harm to his or her family then that person should call 911. Thereafter, a police officer should investigate the matter and determine if the person needs immediate protection. If the police officer believes that emergency protection is needed the officer may issue an emergency protective order (EPO) on the defendant (assuming the defendant can be found). The EPO is a court order that serves to restrain the defendant from contact or communication. The EPO only lasts a few days and will expire on its own if the protected person does not follow up with seeking a DVRO within a few days.
Temporary restraining orders (TROs & Ex parte hearings): A domestic violence restraining order is often filed in court as an ex parte emergency hearing. Ex parte (pronounced like "party") means that only one side is heard; however, in practice, often times the opposing side will defend at an ex parte hearing if the defendant has time to appear in court on an emergency basis (usually the day after the restraining order papers are filed). Notice to the defendant on an ex parte hearing is usually accomplished by phone through a third person or the protected person's attorney. A temporary restraining order only lasts until a full hearing is had in court several weeks later. Not all requests for emergency hearing are granted. However, even if a temporary restraining order is not granted the court will still conduct the follow-up hearing for permanent restraining order at the subsequent court meeting. 
Permanent restraining orders: A permanent restraining order may be granted after a full hearing on the merits. Note: a "permanent" domestic violence restraining order is not actually permanent. A "permanent" domestic violence restraining order only last for up to five years; however, in some cases, a domestic violence restraining order may be renewed for longer periods if the protected person timely files a request to renew the domestic violence restraining order and produces sufficient evidence to warrant such a renewal.
Note: Information and orders on domestic violence restraining orders is updated to law enforcement via the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications Systems (CLETS) and therefore available to all law enforcement. However, copies of a DVRO should be filed with a child's school, day care, physician, dentist, etc., to provide the best protection for any children involved in the case.
Prepare for the domestic violence restraining order hearings:Arrive early as parking and courthouse entry lines may cause tardiness that judge's frown upon and also causes extra stress. Dress like you are about to interview for a new job. Bring a copy of your proof of service, all paperwork filed, and a copy of any evidence you intend to present. If you are afraid of the opposing party inform the the clerk or the deputy of the court. If you do not have a family law attorney with you for your ex parte emergency hearing, or your request for permanent domestic violence restraining order, practice your strongest arguments while understanding that the judge will not entertain more than about fifteen mins at an ex parte hearing or more than two hours at a full hearing for permanent domestic violence restraining order.
Defense against a request for DVRO: The defendant in a DVRO case is entitled to the presumption of innocence. He or she has strong First Amendment Rights of Free Speech and Association and Fourth Amendment Rights to Privacy and the Right to Rear and Protect his or her children. At the same time, people have the right to be free from harassment by others. These rights are balanced in family law court and the defendant has a right to respond to any allegation that might affect his or her rights.
With that said, the most common defenses to DVRO include: silence, impeaching the plaintiff's evidence and properly objecting to the introduction of any damaging evidence. Impeachment of evidence includes demonstrating bias, prejudice, self-defense, alibi, legal justification for conduct (First Amendment Rights to Free Speech & Association, protection of others, etc.), lack of reliability (memory, trustworthiness of testimonial or physical evidence, foundation for photos, audio evidence, scientific evidence, etc.), lack of relevance, and more.
Note: when criminal protective orders (CPOs) are made in criminal court against a defendant and there are conflicting orders in a domestic violence restraining order the criminal protective orders generally prevail if there is a true conflict. For example, no-negative contact orders in CPOs and no-contact orders in a DVROs are not truly conflicting and therefore the defendant must have zero contact with the restained person. For more information on conflicting restraining order qustions please contact our criminal defense and family law attorneys for a free consultation.
DRVOs and child custody or visitations: If the protected person and the restrained person have children in common but the parties were never married then a paternity case (parentage action) may be filed simultaneously with the DVRO request or response. When child custody, visitation, or support is made part of a DVRO request the parties are usually sent to mediation. Advice on mediation is beyond the scope of this article but a party should always seek the advice of a family law attorney before attending child custody and visitation mediation.
Cautionary Note: If physical domestic violence is occurring in the home and in the presence of a child a parent may may face criminal prosecution if he or she does not file a domestic violence restraining order or file a police report against any person that places a child in danger for failure to protect the child (PC 273a(a)). 
There are no fees associated with domestic violence prevention restraining orders by themselves. All forms must be filled out in blue or black ink. Make at least four copies of your paperwork (for filing, service on opposing side, a personal copy and one for your lawyer). Make at least five copies of all court orders (for schools, doctors, police, personal copy, opposing side, etc.).
Note II: All required paperwork must be served on the opposing party by someone that is not a party to the case, a process server, or the Sheriff. Blank copies of Response to Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order (Form DV-120) must also be served on the restrained party. After the opposing party has been served do not forget to file the proof of service with the court (DV-200) or the judge will not hear your request for a domestic violence restraining order. Most importantly, have your Restraining Order After Hearing documents (Form DV-130) written up and filed with the court the day of the court hearing so that you have proof of the court's protective order as soon as possible.
If the restrained party did not show up to court on the hearing for permanent restraining order and the orders requested by the protected person at the hearing are the same as the judge's orders then the protected person may serve the judge's orders by mail (Form DV-250); however, if the orders at the hearing on permanent domestic violence restraining order are different then the protected person's request then the the defendant must be personally served the new orders (Form (DV-200). Never personally serve the orders yourself! 
For more information about California domestic violence restraining orders, or  divorce and family law issues, please contact the Divorce & Family Law Attorneys at Dorado & Dorado, APLC for a free consultation today.
909.725.8199

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Keeping a house of prostitution PC 315 California Law & Defense

California Penal Code Section 315 Keeping a house of prostitution

Law & Defense in California by experienced sex crimes criminal defense attorneys

The law on the crime of keeping a house of prostitution is found at California penal code section 315 (PC 315). If found guilty of PC 315 the defendant could face up to 180 days in jail, fines, place on probation, ordered to stay away from certain places or business practices, or any combination thereof.

Keeping a house of prostitution is to provide a place for prostitution, usually a massage parlor or a house. The person keeping the house of prostitution does not need to be a prostitute in order for PC 315 charges to be levied against the defendant. In fact, proving that any of the patrons are engaged in prostitution does not need to be proved for PC 315 charges.

In addition to the penalties described above, if found guilty of PC 315 keeping a house of prostitution, the defendant could lose his or her professional or occupational license, lose his or her immigration status (for non U.S. citizens), and be made to test for HIV.

Defenses to keeping a house of prostitution charges under PC 315 are numerous but generally include entrapment, improper police investigation, insufficient circumstantial evidence, and more. It many cases it may be possible to reduce PC 315 charges to lesser charges to avoid the harsh penalties associated with the crime of keeping a house of prostitution. 

If you or a loved one has been charged with keeping a house of prostitution under PC 315 contact sex crimes criminal defense attorney Christopher Dorado today. Attorney Dorado will explain your rights and options. In many cases, Attorney Dorado can represent you without the need for you to attend court.

To learn more about sex crimes defense in California, including the crime of keeping a house of prostitution under PC 315, please visit sexcrimesattorney909.com today or call us at 909.913.3138 for a free consultation.

909.913.3138

Sunday, August 17, 2014

PC 653.22(a) Loitering For Prostitution Law & Defense Criminal Defense Attorney California

California Penal Code Section 653.22(a) Loitering For Prostitution Law & Defense

The law on the crime of loitering for prostitution is found at California PC 653.22(a). PC 653.22(a) is a misdemeanor. If found guilty of PC 653.22(a) the defendant could face up to 180 days in jail, placed on probation, fined, and restricted from visiting certain areas of a city. In addition, if found guilty of PC 653.22(a), the defendant will be made to submit a recent HIV test.

Under PC 653.22(a) the defendant will not be made to register as a convicted sex offender and therefore he or she will not be required to register as a sex offender under PC 290 (Sex Offender Registration Law in California).

To find the defendant guilty of the crime of loitering for prostitution under PC 653.22(a), the district attorney will have to prove that the defendant intended to loiter in an area for the purpose of either soliciting a prostitute or to assist a prostitute.

As you can imagine, this can be a difficult case for the prosecutor to prove. Usually the evidence consist of testimony by a police officer who testifies that the defendant was "hanging around an area frequented by prostitutes or driving around in circles where prostitutes congregate.

Of course, if the defendant has a criminal history of prostitution under PC 647(b) Prostitution, PC 315 Keeping a house of prostitution, or similar prostitution charges the district attorney will likely incorporate this into the case to try and prove that the defendant was acting in conformity with his criminal history.

PC 653.22(a) charges may lead to collateral consequences (beside possible jail time, probation, fines) such as problems with immigration status (for non U.S. citizens), professional licensing, loss of driving privileges (for PC 653.22(a) charges where the defendant was driving a vehicle), and more.

Defenses to the crime of loitering for prostitution under PC 653.22(a) range from lack of intent to entrapment to procedural defenses such as improper police interrogation and more. In many cases it may be possible to have PC 653.22(a) charges dismissed or reduced.

If you have been charged with California PC 653.22(a) or loitering for prostitution, contact Criminal Defense Attorney Christopher Dorado without delay. Attorney Dorado is an experienced and aggressive criminal defense attorney with experience in prostitution cases under PC 647(b) and PC 653.22(a). 100% of attorney Dorado's practice is dedicated to criminal defense and initial consultations are free. In many cases of prostitution charges attorney Dorado can represent you with the need for you to appear in court.

Contact prostitution criminal defense attorney Christopher Dorado today. 909.913.3138 or visit our prostitution page at SexCrimesAttorney909.com for more.
For more information on Criminal Defense articles or DUI articles please visit our other criminal defense websites.

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) Explained by a DUI Criminal Defense Attorney

California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) VC DUI Criminal Defense Attorney

The most basic California criminal charge of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI) is found at California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a). There are many different types of California DUI criminal charges in California. These DUI charges include: VC 23152(a), 23152(b), VC 23153(a), VC 23153(b), VC 23105.5, VC 23140, PC 191.5 (Penal Code), and others. 

The California Vehicle Code Section that is charged depends on the facts of the case, including the age of the driver, whether or not the driver is driving a commercial vehicle, whether there are injuries involved, etc.
As stated, the most common criminal charge for a California DUI is found at VC 23152(a). According to VC 23152(a): "It is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or drug, or under the combined influence of any alcoholic beverage and drug, to drive a vehicle."
Notice that the words "0.08% or more" is not included in the language of VC 23152(a). Many people believe that if their Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) is less than 0.08%, also known as "the California legal limit," that they cannot be charged with a California DUI. However, as stated, even if the defendant's BAC is less than 0.08%, he or she may still be charged with DUI under VC 23152(a) if the arresting officer believes that any measurable amount of alcohol or drugs has influenced the driver's ability to safely operate a vehicle.
The penalties for DUI under VC 23152(a) include some or all of the following: Jail terms up to 180 days for a first time offense, license suspension, probation, fines, insurance rate hikes, mandatory DUI class attendance, installation of Interlock Ignition devices, possible immigration consequences (for non-U.S. citizens), professional and/or occupational license suspension or revocation, and more.  
For DUI charges of VC 23152(a), where prior DUIs are alleged to have been committed by the defendant, the penalties can be very severe. For more information on DUI charges under VC 23152(a) with prior DUI convictions contact a DUI attorney.
The only penalty that is not associated with DUI VC 23152(a) charges are those associated with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Administration Per Se (Admin Per Se) hearings. What these means is that the DMV license suspension hearing concerns DUI license suspension only where the driver is found to have a BAC of 0.08% or more.  If the only charge the defendant is facing is a DUI charge of VC 23152(a) then the DMV will not hold a separate hearing to determine whether or not the defendant may keep his or her driver's license. However, if the defendant is ultimately convicted of DUI under VC 23152(a), then the DMV will likely suspend the driver's license for six months on a first time DUI charge.
It may be possible to reduce a DUI which is charged under VC 23152(a). It may also be possible to reduce the sentence or penalties associated with a DUI charged under VC 23152(a).
To learn more about a California DUI charged under VC 23152(a), contact a San Bernardino DUI attorney today. There is no charge to speak to a qualified DUI attorney and our office is available for advice 24/7.
We offer advice on all California DUI charges including, but not limited to, VC 23152(a), in San Bernardino County, including the cities of RedlandsRialto, FontanaRancho CucamongaYucaipaVictorville, Mentone, Ontario, Riverside and more.
Call Today! 909.913.3138 for a free consultation

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

DUI Attorney Rancho Cucamonga 909.913.3138 Free Consultations Rancho Cucamonga DUI Attorney

DUI Attorney Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Free Consultations

DUI attorney Christopher Dorado represents drivers accused of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs (DUI) in the county of San Bernardino, including the cities of Redlands, Colton, Rialto, Yucaipa, Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Victorville, and more.

One hundred percent of attorney Dorado's practice is dedicated to Criminal Defense and DUI and first consultations are free. If you are charged with a Rancho Cucamonga DUI, contact a Rancho Cucamonga DUI attorney without delay. Important: YOU ONLY HAVE 10 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ARREST FOR DUI TO CONTACT THE DMV IN ORDER TO REQUEST A HEARING TO SAVE YOUR DRIVING PRIVILEGES.

To learn more about Rancho Cucamonga DUI attorney Christopher Dorado please visit ChristopherDoradoLaw.com or call 909.913.3138 Today!

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

California Prostitution Laws Penal Code 647(b) PC Criminal Defense Attorney


California Prostitution Laws can be found at California Penal Code Section 647(b) PC. Prostitution is a misdemeanor in California (Felony Prostitution can be charged in certain situations).

To be found guilty of prostitution in California (Penal Code 647(b)), the prosecutor must prove that the defendant agreed to exchange money, or something of value, in exchange for sex, or sexual type conduct from a prostitute.

The prosecutor must also prove that the defendant did something more than simply agree to exchange money for sexual conduct. The prosecutor must prove that the defendant did something in furtherance of that agreement. For example: asking a prostitute to take off his or her clothes would be an act in furtherance of the agreement to exchange money for sexual conduct.

It is also considered prostitution if the defendant "solicited" a prostitute. This means that even if there is no agreement between the prostitute and the defendant the defendant may still be charged with prostitution if he or she requested the services of a prostitute.

If found guilty of prostitution the defendant can face up to 180 days for a first offense. For a second offense, the court must sentence the defendant to no less than 45 days. For a third offense, the court must sentence the defendant to no less than 90 days.

In addition to the penalties listed above, criminal convictions in general carry other punishments such as immigration consequences, probation terms, fines, licensing restrictions, and more.

In some cases it might be possible to change the charge and/or the sentence for prostitution (Penal Code 647(b)).

If you have been charged with prostitution in California contact a criminal defense attorney without delay. Criminal Defense Attorney Christopher Dorado will explain your rights and defenses if you have been charged with prostitution in California. Attorney Dorado represents defendants charged with prostitution (Penal Code 647(b) in County of San Bernardino, including the cities of Rialto, Colton, Ontario, Redlands, Fontana, Yucaipa, Victorville, Rancho Cucamonga, and more. Call Today for free Consultation with a San Bernardino County criminal defense attorney. 909.913.3138

To learn more about California prostitution laws, please visit San Bernardino County Prostitution Criminal Defense Attorney